The American Idea

The flavour of modernity is a concept that is employed to illustrate the put forward of being associated to modernism which, on the a nonher(prenominal) hand, refers to a pattern of thought that confirms the run of individuals to construct, enhance, and reform their environment. Further, the attainment project envisions the melodic theme that new beledge or sympathy eject be obtained which en competents the clearness of perception.Hence, interpreted altogether, modernity in the context of the enlightenment exacts the capacity of piece beings to establish or reestablish their environment by the phylogenesis of new wisdom and, more importantly, through the use of their reason or rationality. jean Jacques Rousseau argued that the original state of man is hotshot which is essenti all(prenominal)y free, or that license is in the beginning humanitys own. Moreover, he wanders that freedom has been lost but bunghole only be brought back through emancipation.In foothold of modernity and the enlightenment, this emancipation drop be taken back by employ mans rationality in order to clearly perceive what moldiness be d mavin so that individuals finish reform their environment and, in the end, go back the freedom that they originally hand. All these notions shtup be seen in Jose Martis Nuestra the States specifically in the context of how he suggests that the the Statesns should act in order to determine their environment and to eventually build a brass that is uniquely their own and whiz that is devoid of strange judgements and forms.There atomic number 18 kind of s eeral sharp notions in Nuestra the States by Jose Marti, and all of these notions very headspring contribute to the revelation that with variety show rallys the big(p) possibility of acquiring an identity indie as it is from every involvement else outside. Although much of what is written verifies the idea that the public of a politics of the plenty surpasses that whic h is merely imitated, the role of the hostile elements tummy be argued as indispensable elements in the ecesis of an identity.One of the central themes in Nuestra the States is the idea of the formation of the political sympathies that is characteristic and proper to the the Statesns. Martis argument is grounded on the premise that a governing body that is determine according to other solid grounds or that which resembles or at least partly incorporates inter tribeal elements from foreign landed estates will not be suitable for the people and for the entire kingdom. It stub be observed that Marti firmly adheres to the denomination of faith of having an identity that is solidly based on what is raw(a) to the people and to the simplicity of the country.What is natural supersedes those that atomic number 18 artificial. And what is essentially natural to the States is assortment in the truest sense of the word. Apparently, Marti makes it a point to bridge the issue w ith change to that of having a strong government social structured according to the innate qualities of the American people. However, it fails to debate the feature that diversity in like manner grants the self-coloured possibility of not veridically consolidative all the corners of the country into a unity and identifiable sphere.What Marti does is to transcend this diversity and secret plan all the differentalbeit intrinsicAmerican elements into a co-ordinated concept that or so quells, at least in theory, the t ply of other foreign factors. He does this at least in the sense of proposing an ideological battle, single that treats ideas far superior than puppet or fleshly force. Although Marti argues that bloodshed is inevitable, he also suggests that the ideas of man will have to take the core of the feces towards the establishment of an independent and unique government and that these ideas should come from the American people themselves and not from anybody e lse.In the opening part of Martis exert, it can be utteranced that he argues that men mustiness unify themselves from the various ranks against the seven-league giant through the force of their ideas since ideas cannot be physically undone. plot of ground it is remains feasible that ideas cannot be destroyed in the physical sense and that spot they can significantly proliferate and remove the victory of an entire nation, the role of filmy physical force in propel much(prenominal) ideas towards true goals cannot be denied.It should be noted that ideas have to be lay with physical and actual attempts of progressing towards a certain goal which, specifically in the context of Martis Nuestra America, is the installation of an American government in the strictest sense. By remaining as mere ideas contextualized solely on that rational or thinking part of human existence, ideas can hardly be a revolutionizing tool in altering the unenviable elements within the order busin essss.In another sense, in that respect should be the correspondence between such ideas and their physical or actual manifestation (Glennon and Johnson 2006). The absence of such a correspondence whitethorn very tumefy inhibit the ideas from ever reaching the desired outcomes, for what good is a prolific idea that is short of speck the actual existence of amicable problems and the worldly concern of the clamoring for a physical government? Will ideas alone revolutionize a whole nation without even concretizing these ideas? Apparently, the solving to these questions is a resounding skepticism.History, at the least, tells one that most, if not all, of the changes or alterations in the society have, in one way or another, physical and actual movements which are powerfully fastened to certain beliefs and ideologies (Merrill 1948). For instance, the American change is considered to be founded on political and social ideologies that corkingly contribute to the social movement du ring those times where the metaphorical ammunitions for artilleries are ideas that repair what is being aimed at (Nelson 1965).Wars in Latin America are uniformwise strongly founded on the correspondence between ideologies and the actual manifestation or enacting of these ideas (Thies 2005). Nevertheless, Marti also recognizes the notion that bloodshed is a strong coefficient of his proposed ideas of the uniting of the American people and the establishment of a government solely their own and from their own.Marti strengthens to change integrity his claim by suggesting that those who would seek the presidential term of America must focus on and attempt at identifying the reality of the nation and of the peopleof the existing diversity that direly postulate unificationin order to fit the idea that the spirit of the government is at that placefore the spirit that is truly derived from America and not from any other (Saldivar 1998).Hence, for those people seeking to identify wha t is being suggested to be set must necessarily have the dainty perception to not only go through what is real but to notice and straighten up the solutions for the reality of the social problems or, at least, of what is mean to be addressed. Otherwise, those who seek to eliminate the external or foreign elements seeping into American thoughts will utterly fail for leave out of the capacity to transcend the blurring of the mind and of critical thinking.Such an attempt to identify the reality of the nation and of the people reinforces the idea that the cleanse and accommodation individuals to achieve such feat are those who are accustomed to Americaand on that point can be no remediate person who does not only know much of America but acts and feels like America than the American. This goes to show that the foreigner cannot just feel the American reality, or that the foreign elements cannot entirely suffice to define the American experience although in some parts it whit ethorn have some intimacy to do with it.Nevertheless, Martis Nuestra America clearly emphasizes the authors strong attachment, at least in terms of the content of the literature, with the clamoring for a pure American nation, a nation that is founded on American elements. Yet what is impinging close Martis Nuestra America is the fact that it proposes for a unified government able to identify the reality of the nation, a unified government that is nonetheless rooted on a wide array of individuals or on a, roughly speaking, diversified society.It is so a widely held idea that the symmetry of America is various (Sullivan 1973), and that this entails the notion that a unification of all the recognized and unacknowledged sectors of the nations is a monumental task. While Marti champions his command that foreign ideas and forms have caused the delay in the rising of a logical structure of a government of America, he fails to note that the very diversity of America also has a role in such a delay.What he does in the article is to espouse the idea that such diversity can be committed towards the creation of a unique government and a unified people and to set excursus or, at least, subtly put his hand off the lingering argument that this diversity may in fact be the one which will hinder the creation of an American government bereft of trade ideas and forms.Although essential forcesforces not to be circumscribed in the military sensecan keep at bay threatening external or foreign forces from go in the layer that separates what is pure from what is alien, these selfsame(prenominal) congenital forces have a connection with the external forces in one way or another. Part of the evidence to this can be rooted from the argument that in that location is no such thing as a pure race that is distinct from the rest of the races since all of mankind emerged from a mavin ancestry otherwise known as Homo sapiens (McBrearty 1990).With the idea that all of humanity came from a single follow of ancestry, by definition there can be no such thing as race and that the demarcation between the American race and the other races is dissolved. Technically, it may be true that mankind belongs to the same ancestry. Practically, there are staggering realities that at last create a wide seat between socially constructed races or equivalents thereof.Hence, although Jose Marti really claims that there is no such thing as hatred for the other races because there are no races, he actually argues in Nuestra America that the people should consider the past, family and ancestral roots of the Americans and do past with what can be termed as compound inheritance for it entails things that are corrupt and defunct. By criticizing the Parisians or Madrileos, Marti actually draws the line between what is American from what is not.And in doing so, it cannot be avoided that Nuestra America in essence may contribute to the enlargement of the space that divides Ameri ca from the merchandise ideas and forms and, thus, the treatment of these foreign entities as others. Martis work also appears to destine that America is indeed its own, and that what belongs to others is theirs as well which brings us back to what Martis work purports to address yet fails to meetthat there is no hatred among races because there is no such thing as race.Ironically, tour Nuestra America echoes the clamoring for a unique government that is purely American by vanquishing the foreign or import ideas that are imbibed into the society, it also establishes the idea of separating what is American from what is not if indeed a separation can ever be achieved at all, if not physically, at least ideologically. The fact that America and its people are diverse is a compelling reason to fight down the idea that the rest of America can hardly a government mold into a single, unified entity where opposition is inexistent or kept at a teachable level.Moreover, heathen relativ ism proclaims the idea that several set such as ethical value of rightness or wrongness may actually vary from culture to culture, and that heathenish supremacy or the superiority of one culture from the other relatively varies as well on certain cultural perspectives (Schmidt 1955). From this, one can observe that Martis article conveys the idea that, by excluding anything that is foreign to the system of ideas of the American population, the American ideals are preferred over the foreign ones.Although there is no explicit mentioning that American ideals are far off better than trade ideas, by embracing American ideas in the formation of a unique government one actually albeit subliminally pursues the underlying given that what is native is more preferred since it applies better and fitting to the contextual nature of America and, therefore, is superior over the rest at least when put into the context of the formation of a unique government.Interestingly, cultural relativism te lls us otherwise. The American attempt to furnish for themselves a unique government excludes the assumption that import ideas may also serve a contributive purpose in showdown such an end in alternate for defunct native ideas.While Nuestra America purports to assert for an American identity through its government and purely American ideas while agony foreign elements away from such a glaring feat, it also substantiates on the dissertation of using the American diversity as a means towards unifying the whole, condense them altogether into a single native label called America without discussing much about the weakening force such a diversity may take with it.Nevertheless, Jose Marti nails the essential point in his workthe great significance of ideas in the advancement of an American identityby taking experimental condition the role of ideas in revolutionizing a nation flustered with unfamiliar or imported ideas. While it may be the berth that ideas without corresponding action s are like vehicles without wheels, it sure as shooting is the case that actions without ideas are like dotty storms which display their destructive might while leaving debris and rubbish by and by the winds and heavy rains abate.