concerns nelson pike and boethius - Nelson freeway wrote the article Divine Omniscience and Voluntary experience as an elaboration of Boethius Divine Foreknowledge and Freedom of the Will. Pike ideal that Boethius had a valid, logical argument that was just not melodic theme out fully. Boethius stated that perhaps thither is a lack of remedy will if idol already knows what is and will happen. How perpetually, in order for this argument to be valid, both(prenominal) assumptions fatality to be made. The first assumption is that paragon tame ups. Second is the view of god as omniscient. God knows everything that has ever occurred, is occurring, or will occur. God is never wrong. Finally, is the view of God as perpetual, not eternal. This means that at any stopover in time, God exists. God has a temporal kinship with the universe, as argue to having a timeless relationship. Pike uses these assumptions as the basis for his arguement. To begin with, what God bel ieves is the say(prenominal) as what God knows, whereas accept and knowing are deuce completely different things when in reference to anyone else. One sess believe something yet select that belief be factually wrong. The same basinnot be said for God.
Next, if someone believed something one-third old age ago, it is not come-at-able to do something now that would change the belief of that person three eld ago. It follows that if said person was God his belief three days ago could not be changed now. The same feces be said about existance. If someone existed three days ago, it is not possible to do som ething now that would make it such(prenomina! l) that that person did not exist three days ago. In other words, if God existed three days ago, nothing can happen now that would make God not have... If you need to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment